Your cart is currently empty!
Comparison by characteristics
Each article should have a goal, and the reader should get something after reading it – new knowledge, interesting ideas, tips for implementation, motivation.
Plenty is not the same as volume. You can write a 500-character post and it will be more useful than a 10,000-character stream of consciousness.
Don’t pour water – this is what deprives your article of that very “completeness”. It is better to overdry than to overwater.
2 Ease of assimilation
Make sure you don’t overload the reader and the information is easy to understand. It’s better to simplify than to complicate. Instead of complicated words, use “human” ones. Believe me, simple doesn’t mean stupid. But by complicating everything, you will only scare away readers.
3 Structure of presentation
The article should have logic. The reader should italy telegram data not have the feeling that the article is incoherent, and the author jumps from one thought to another without bringing each of them to the end.
Structure the information into subsections, lists, headings, highlight smart thoughts and focus on the most important. Make your article easy to read.
4 Submission
I have already written about presentation above. I got this concept not from cooking, but from dancing. You may have noticed that when demonstrating the same combination, one dancer can light up the audience, while another, although performing the same movements, does not win them over at all. So, that very fire of the first dancer is called “presentation”.
What do articles and writing have to do with it? Essentially, the author is a dancer, and his text is a dance. And success depends on how well he manages to ignite the reader. Surely you have favorite authors who, even when discussing banal topics, attract database d you with their vision, style, and “presentation.” Your task is to develop your own, and ignite the reader with your articles.
How can you do this? Practice, regular practice — that’s the only way. Write every day. Write short posts on social networks, write full-fledged articles on your blog — analyze your mistakes, learn from them. Notice what you do well, and improve on it. And then you will have both a “presentation” and good articles that people enjoy reading, want to share, and come back to again and again.
And as an appetizer, a presentation for a lecture on writing articles for the PRyanik course:
- Boring – an article overloaded with terms, complex language, lack of interesting thoughts and ideas. Such an article is boring to read, so readers will leave after the first paragraph.
- Copying competitors – you find a find related queries to beat the competition successful blogger in your field, and simply repeat all of his ideas. He writes about Venice – tomorrow you write about Venice too. He gives style advice from Walter White – you give style advice from Walter White. It won’t work that way.
What kind of article can be called good? We can have long discussions, but I have identified 4 key points, by implementing which in your texts, you will certainly be liked by readers.
Leave a Reply